Nucleos(t)ide analogues altered quasispecies composition of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-resistant mutations in serum HBV DNA and serum HBV RNA.

Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA is a new serological indicator reflecting viral replication with good clinical application prospects. This study aimed to clarify the dynamic changes of serum HBV RNA levels and the quasispecies of HBV RNA virus-like particles in nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients harboring NAs-resistant mutations and their identifiable effects on NAs resistance. We included CHB patients who were on long-term NAs treatment and with HBV DNA rebound. The longitudinally dynamics of serum HBV RNA levels were quantitatively detected, and the quasispecies differences between serum HBV DNA and serum HBV RNA were compared by high-throughput sequencing. The effect of NAs concentration pressure on altering the resistance mutations quasispecies proportion of HBV DNA and HBV RNA in cell supernatant was analyzed in vitro. A total of 447 serum samples from 36 CHB patients treated with NAs were collected. The median follow-up period was 47 months (about 4 years), and the longest follow-up period was 117 months (about 10 years). Our results showed that HBV RNA could reflect virological breakthrough in 23 (64%, 23/36) patients, and serum HBV RNA rebound earlier than HBV DNA in 12 (52%, 12/23) patients. However, serum HBV RNA remained at a consistently high level and did not fluctuate significantly with the HBV DNA rebound in 6 of 36 patients. In addition, serum HBV RNA was not consistently detectable in 7 of the 36 patients, and their serum HBV RNA was undetectable even after HBV DNA had rebounded. The proportion of drug-resistant mutations in HBV DNA was higher than that of HBV RNA by high-throughput sequencing. The results of in vitro experiments showed that the viral strains with drug-resistant mutation in HBV DNA in cell supernatants gradually become the dominant strains with the increase of NAs concentrations. Serum HBV RNA levels can reflect virological breakthrough in most NAs- treated CHB patients, but there are certain limitations. NAs alter the quasispecies composition of serum HBV DNA and serum HBV RNA, resulting in a higher detection rate of drug-resistant mutations in serum HBV DNA than in serum HBV RNA.

Lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir than entecavir in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 90,897 participants.

Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are equally recommended as first-line treatments for antiviral treatment-naïve (ART-naïve) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients by practice guidelines because of their similarly high antiviral efficacy and low resistance rate. However, whether one is superior to the other in terms of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prevention is currently largely controversial. We aimed to identify and synthesize these existing studies regarding the HCC risk of these two highly potent antivirals in treatment-naïve CHB patients. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies between January 1, 2012 and June 25, 2022. These studies used ETV monotherapy and/or TDF monotherapy to treat ART-naïve CHB patients and reported the incidence of HCC. The extracted data were analyzed using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. The HCC incidence difference was expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of 17 studies with 90,897 ART-naïve CHB patients (ETV = 60,980 vs TDF = 29,917) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a significant lower cumulative incidence of HCC (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.76). No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was found among the included studies (I2 = 48.1%, Begg's p = 0.363 and Egger's p = 0.748). TDF is associated with a lower risk of HCC compared with entecavir in ART-naïve CHB patients. The results suggest that TDF may be a better option for ART-naïve CHB patients with high HCC risks.

Multiple drug-resistant HBV mutation may contribute to poor response of adefovir + entecavir in entecavir-resistant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Adefovir plus entecavir (ADV+ETV) rescue therapy in ETV-resistant patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is suboptimal in some patients. This study aims to elucidate the evolutionary characteristics of drug-resistant HBV mutants and their association with clinical responses in such patients. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-seven ETV-resistant patients were enrolled, among whom twelve had an inadequate virological response to ADV+ETV rescue therapy. The clonal sequence (³ 20 clones/sample) of HBV reverse transcriptase gene was performed to identify the resistance mutations. Phenotypic analysis was performed to evaluate the replication capacity and drug susceptibility of the mutants. RESULTS: ETV-resistant mutants were continuously detected in 10 of the 12 patients, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) mutants, including a novel strain (rtL180M+A181V+T184A+S202G+M204V), were detected in two patients. Seven of the 12 patients who subsequently received tenofovir (TDF)-based therapy for 38 (23-60) months all achieved undetectable HBV DNA after treatment, and ETV-resistant mutants converted to wild-type in the four patients' samples. In contrast, the other five patients who did not achieve an adequate virological response had remaining of ETV-resistant mutants. The novel MDR strain exhibited multiple resistances to LAM, ADV, and ETV, and 11.2-fold lower susceptibility to TDF. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate that MDR HBV mutations may contribute to the poor efficacy of ADV+ETV combination therapy in ETV-resistant patients. Moreover, a novel MDR HBV strain was identified. Our results indicate that a TDF-based rescue therapy would be effective for the treatment of the refractory cases.

Hepatitis B virus mutation pattern rtL180M+A181C+M204V may contribute to entecavir resistance in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Entecavir (ETV) resistance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) conventionally requires rt184, 202, or 250 mutations plus lamivudine-resistance mutation (rtM204V/I ± L180M). This study aimed to clarify whether rtL180M+A181C+M204V mutations may contribute to HBV ETV resistance. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 22,009 patients who underwent resistance testing in Beijing 302 Hospital from 2007 to 2016. HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) gene was screened by direct sequencing and verified by clonal sequencing. Phenotypic analysis was performed for evaluating replication capacity and drug susceptibility. RESULTS: Classical ETV-resistance mutations of HBV were detected in 1252 patients who were receiving ETV therapy. The rtA181C mutation was detected with rtL180M+M204V mutations in 18 lamivudine-experienced ETV-treated patients, and the emergence of the mutations was associated with virological breakthrough or inadequate virological response to ETV. Patient-derived representative rtA181C-containing mutants, rtL180M+A181C+M204V, rtL180M+A181C+M204V+M250V, and rtL180M+A181C+S202G+M204V, exhibited 45.7%, 25.9%, and 25.0% replication capacity and 85.6-, 356.1-, and 307.1-fold decreased susceptibility to ETV respectively compared to the wild-type strain, while the three mutants remained sensitive to tenofovir (TDF). Artificial elimination of rtA181C largely restored the rtL180M+A181C+M204V mutant's sensitivity to ETV. Molecular modelling of viral RT binding to ETV showed that the rtL180M+A181C+M204V mutant had a less stable conformation compared to rtL180M+M204V mutant. In clinical practice, undetectable serum HBV DNA was achieved in two of five longitudinally followed rtA181C-positive patients who received switching-to TDF therapy, but not in the other three who received add-on adefovir therapy during observation. CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and experimental data support rtL180M+A181C+M204V as a novel non-classical ETV-resistance mutation pattern.

Hepatitis B virus rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutation may increase resistance fold to adefovir- and entecavir-resistant mutants compared to rtA181T/sW172* mutation.

The study aimed to characterize rtA181T/sW172stop (*) and rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutations of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Total of 22,009 patients who visited Beijing 302 Hospital from 2007 to 2016 were enrolled. These patients all received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment and their serum samples were collected for sequence analysis of HBV reverse-transcriptase (RT) and S regions. The rtA181T mutation was detected in 5.37% (1182/22,009) of the patients' samples. The rtA181T-causative sW172*, sW172non-stop (sW172 L/S), and mixed sW172*/non-stop mutations occupied 82.91%, 7.70%, and 9.39%, respectively. The patients with rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutants had a higher HBV DNA level compared to those with rtA181T/sW172* mutants. 44.33% (524/1182) rtA181T-positive samples were detected with signature drug-resistant mutations, including 325 with adefovir-resistant mutation rtA181V/N236T, 57 with lamivudine-resistant mutation rtM204V/I, 99 with entecavir-resistant mutation rtM204V/I plus rt184/202/250 substitution(s), and 43 with multidrug-resistant mutation rtA181V/N236T + rtM204V/I ± rt184/202/250 substitution(s). The rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutation had a higher ratio of coexistence with adefovir-resistant mutation compared to rtA181T/sW172* mutation (42.86% vs. 24.59%, P < 0.05). rtA181T/sW172S + rtN236T and rtA181T/sW172L + rtN236T mutants exhibited higher HBV DNA production and adefovir resistance fold than that of rtA181T/sW172* + rtN236T mutant (98.02% and 85.5% vs. 42.1% in HBV DNA production, and 7.38-fold and 5.49-fold vs. 3.69-fold in half maximal effective concentration of wild-type strain); rtA181T/sW172L + rtS202G + rtM204V strain exhibited higher HBV DNA production and entecavir resistance fold than that of rtA181T/sW172* + rtS202G + rtM204V strain (50.98% vs. 34.49%, 524.00-fold vs. 69.33-fold). In conclusion, rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutation may increase resistance fold of adefovir- and entecavir-resistant mutants compared to rtA181T/sW172* mutation and might influence clinical presentation of NAs-treated patients.